‘OBJECTION!’ Ex-Trump aide Hicks tight-lipped in U.S. House interview
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Hope Hicks, formerly certainly one of President Donald Trump’s closest aides, repeatedly declined to deal to questions on Wednesday within a interview with U.S. congressional investigators, with lawyers at her side carefully orchestrating her responses.
Democrats said Hicks’ responses through the eight-hour session to questions from members of the House Judiciary Committee, who want to determine whether her former boss broke regulations, were restricted by the point of absurdity.
Democratic Representative Ted Lieu posted on Twitter what he known as the sample exchange, when using the questions modified as the content in the interview was private. Lieu’s tweet said:
“Chair: Ms. Hicks, is it a sunny day on the first day of work?
“Ridiculous DOJ Attorney: OBJECTION!
“Chair: Where was your working environment located?
“Ridiculous DOJ Attorney: OBJECTION!”
House of Representatives Democrats and Trump happen to be fighting a running battle for months over their power to investigate him, with tasks of it spilling in to the courts.
Hicks’ appearance was hailed by Democrats in the form of breakthrough to the Judiciary Committee’s broad inquiry into Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian meddling inside 2019 U.S. election that will help Trump, and Trump’s attempts to impede the probe.
Republicans who attended the job interview, arranged and led by way of majority-Democratic panel, claimed it yielded little new information, where they accused Democrats of political harassment of Trump, a criticism that Republicans have long voiced.
Related Coverage
- Explainer: Can Trump block ex-aide Hicks from in conversation with Congress by citing immunity?
“It looks to be Democrats working to relitigate the Mueller report,” said Republican Representative Matt Gaetz.
Democrats wished to ask Hicks, 30, about six instances that they believe Trump might have obstructed justice through the 2019 campaign and while in the White House.
White House lawyers argued that Hicks was “immune” from having to testify about her 14 months with the White House, an option in line with Trump’s general refusal to cooperate with investigations in the Democratic-led House.
Hicks was directed to fail to answer questions about material she’d already told Mueller, the lawmakers said.
Democrat Steve Cohen said he learned nothing new from Hicks and added that he did not answer one particular question about her level of the While House.
Lieu said Hicks did fix the campaign, but he didn’t elaborate.
Some committee Democrats said White House lawyers would not claim executive privilege for Hicks. Democrats also said they’ll go to court to force Hicks to respond to their questions.
“We should establish the record of her refusal to answer the questions with the intention that she can need to do it. So this is what we’re doing today,” Representative David Cicilline said.
‘SO SAD’
Trump used his Twitter account to chastise the Democrats, saying: “So sad the Democrats are putting wonderful Hope Hicks through hell, for Many years now, after total exoneration by Robert Mueller & the Mueller Report. They were unhappy with result to make sure they want a Do Over.”
Hicks was Trump’s campaign press secretary and White House communications director until she left in March 2019 , later becoming chief communications officer and executive vice president for Fox Corp, parent of Fox News.
She walked on the behind-closed-doors interview on Wednesday in any Capitol Hill business building surrounded by cameras and reporters, gazing straight ahead and ignoring shouted questions. She departed without moaning, as well.
A source comfortable with the situation says Hicks remains around Trump and is a great supporter but doesn’t speak with him as much as she did when she worked on the White House, where her office was right beyond Oval Office. When Trump is at Los Angeles recently, she visited with him.
Hicks was mentioned at a minimum 183 times in any redacted version of Mueller’s report, released on April 18, and Judiciary Committee Democrats want to ask her about alleged hush money payments made while in the campaign to two women, including porn actress Stormy Daniels, who say one of several affairs with Trump. He has denied the affairs.
They also wanted Hicks to discuss five a example of potential obstruction of justice by Trump that can be laid out in Mueller’s report, along with the president’s efforts to impede the Mueller investigation.
“No prior president has involved in such a transparent effort to bar his own former aides from testifying concerning the president’s misconduct,” Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler said with a letter into the White House counsel.
PELOSI ON IMPEACHMENT
The Judiciary Committee is where any effort to impeach Trump, which Democrats have discussed for months, would begin.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has supported letting multiple congressional investigations of Trump enjoy before moving to impeach him. On Wednesday, she said in the event the investigations find criminal wrongdoing, the route would be clear.
“If your goods are there, one should impeach,” Pelosi told reporters in a Christian Science Monitor breakfast.
A transcript of Hicks’ testimony was anticipated to be released via the committee and featured at the Thursday hearing where panel will examine an ABC News interview through which Trump said he saw no problem with accepting damaging knowledge about a U.S. political opponent from your foreign government, aides said.
Mueller’s 448-page report found insufficient evidence to find out that the Trump campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow, despite numerous contacts involving the campaign and Russia. What’s more, it described numerous attempts by Trump to impede Mueller’s investigation but stopped lacking declaring that he committed a crime.
Democratic Representative Joe Neguse said the hearing was “productive” on pre-election parts of Mueller’s investigation. But Neguse added: “The White House’s baseless objections and quote unquote testimonial privilege make asserted ‘s no position that is tenable for them to take.”